OpenOffice 150 Times Cheaper Than Microsoft Office?

Yep, that's the statement from the French. OpenOffice.org is 150 times cheaper than Microsoft Office. And this is the French tax office that's switching, so you've got to think they've got the numbers right.

"The French tax agency claims that upgrading its 80,000 desktops to Office XP would cost €29.5 million, but switching to OpenOffice.org only €200,000."

Also:

"The tax agency has supported its open source products in-house in the past, but is now contracting it to external companies to ensure quality of service across the board.

"The contractors make a barrier between me and the complexity of the open source community. Today, I can contact the open source community if I want support, but there's no engagement or commitment. Contractors provide that commitment and manage the community and smaller companies that provide the support," says Lapeyre."

Here's the link from Schestowitz.com.

Here's the article.

I'd say, that's a bargain!


Tags

Various Good Linux Links

StuffedpenguinFirst and most importantly of all, here's where to buy your very own stuffed Linux penguin.
http://cart.cheapbytes.com/cgi-bin/cart/1000010003.html

Linked to from here (Tom Adelstein) and here (Anton) on LXer.com

Nice site on why Linux is better. Just the benefits and features.
http://www.whylinuxisbetter.net/

An article on Ubuntu.
http://www.certcities.com/editorial/columns/story.asp?EditorialsID=204

A post on the true story of a $179 computer from Fry's; total cost of everything with additional hardware ended up $366. Things get a lot cheaper when you don't pay for the operating system.
http://www.sellsbrothers.com/news/showTopic.aspx?ixTopic=1972

And another post on that same ad in Fry's.
http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060310/3043/

Microsoft Owns Your Tube Top

Tubtop_logo

Remember that commercial for Compass bank, that shows the woman at an ATM in her closet? The ATM told her, "I'm sorry, there will be $2 fee to access your tube top."

(Honest, there is a commercial like that. I'm not just using blatant sexy illustrations for shock value to draw attention to the benefits of ODF.)

That's what the Open Document Format, or ODF, is all about. Lots of people and organizations want all documents to be in .odf rather than .doc or .xls format.

Most software you use creates documents  in a propriety format. That means that the way the software creates the files is exclusive to the people who wrote that software. You can't use another program to open your own files, or at least your choices are very narrow.  That means you need to buy software to continue to open files with those formats--if you want to be able to continue to access your own documents.  Your thoughts, your meeting minutes, your personal budget spreadsheets, etc.--all need to be rented from the people who wrote the software.

Doesn't it seem kind of odd to have to keep paying for the right to get at documents you created?. It's like paying to rent a house you own. It's like having to pay a fee to get into your own closet for your own tube top.

OpenOffice.org, Sun, and other folks think everyone, including Microsoft, should write programs that output documents in  Open Document Format. The instructions for creating programs that make ODF documents are available for anybody to use. That way, when all programs create documents in the same format, then you don't have to pay to open your documents. You can pick the application you want to use, there will be zillions of them, and some of them are free. You aren't dependent on one software program to get at your documents. OpenOffice.org uses ODF format.

Here's an article on what's going on with a group that was formed to promote ODF, and Microsoft.
http://www.hunterstrat.com/news/2006/03/07/eu-watchdogs-have-their-eye-on-microsoft-office/

Here's the web site of the fine folks of the Open Document Format.
http://www.odfalliance.org/

And here's the web site of Scott Johnson who just sums things up quite nicely regarding open source, and open document format. See the item at the end of his list.
http://fuzzyblog.com/archives/2006/03/08/the-trip-home-open-source-in-minnesota/


IBM Is Going Microsoft-Free Internally

It's like a John Lennon song. "Imagine all the people....living without any Microsoft products...." And not just a few people.  About 330,000 people. Additional people.

IBM has canceled their contract with Microsoft. They will be using RedHat for the operating system and their own riff on OpenOffice.org for their office suite.

Here's an article on it, and related sites on the Windows Vista Weblog and Groklaw.

IBM--while we're chatting, I just want to mention, I could probably free up some time to train your internal employees. ;>   training@getopenoffice.org   


Make Your Organization's Productivity Go to 11 With GetOpenOffice.org Onsite Training

This is my gratuitously commercial blog about the importance and benefits of training. I do training, it's great, users are happier, and it doesn't cost that much compared to what you save with OpenOffice.org.

If you so don't care about that :> and you just want some tips on using OpenOffice.org, please feel free to skip to my other blog for today, using templates. Templates are huge time savers, especially with one of the extra tips I cover in the blog.
If you're in charge of or interested in getting training or learning materials for OpenOffice.org, though, read on. Come with me and see if this makes sense for your organization. See if any of this seems likely or familiar.

Imagine you're Jane in Contracts.
You hear about the new software that's coming. And there it is, on your computer. You freak, because you've been working in Microsoft Office for ten years, you know just how things work, there are tweaks you've made you're very proud of, and all this work and knowledge is going to go down the frickin' drain. Because of those geeks in IT! AAAARGH!!! You'd like to take your computer and stuff it down the throat of the person who made the decision in the first place.

Unhappyusersmaller

Now you know that Jane can figure it out on her own. Given the right attitude, at least; the confidence that she can figure it out. But she's pissed. And she has huge deadlines looming and she's going to just keep working in Microsoft Office. In spite of all the lovely memos you send out about OpenOffice.org being the preferred software. Or she might just not do the work because she doesn't think she can. Or get halfway through her work but she has a question, she can't find the solution, you haven't given her a book, she's not used to online help, she's not the type who habitually googles online forums, and she's frustrated and wants to go home and do the eight hours of work she has to do there.

And you're frustrated because you think it's easy, workable software and you don't know why everyone keeps calling you with questions.

They're not all calling you because they can't figure it out. They're calling to say “You plunked this on my desk, you didn't give me any help, you didn't ask my opinion or acknowledge that this will take some work, and I am going to make you PAY.”

Some of them, anyway. Enough to make a lot of people pissed and frustrated.

This is how it works when you bring in the software first without any documentation or training.

So what do you do about that?

Now, keep in mind that this isn't really about the software. Somewhat, of course, but it's really about change.

Not surprisingly, I think it's really important that new users have training. Before they have to start using it for their jobs, ideally, but anytime is better than nothing. Training doesn't just teach people how to use the software. It helps deal with the change.

I of course think training is important because that's my business. ;>  But I've also been there and seen how confused and frustrated people are, for the reasons outlined earlier. They come in to my class at 9 AM, and they're skeptical and annoyed. At 4 PM, they think they rock. They've had a chance to see how much they know and how many functions are easy to figure out. They've had a chance to ask those three questions about the stuff that they can't figure out. And they've seen that the IT group, or whoever's in charge, is committed enough, and cares enough, to provide training.

HappyusersmallHappy users are more productive. Happy users say hi to you in the hall rather than growling. Happy users mean you as IT director are happy. And it doesn't cost that much to get all that.

Training makes a huge difference in those six hours plus lunch.

Users are so much happier about the switch, in general, at the end of a day of training. After four years, I've seen a lot of attitude changes, and it's clear the students are going to go back their desks and just tear through the projects that were taking them ages before. They even ask for CDs of the software, and of the workbook lab files, to take home! Honest. It happens. The change in confidence and attitude is great—it's why I do training.

Training doesn't cost much compared to how much you save.

In comparison to how much you save with OpenOffice.org (and with Linux if you switch to that too), the time and money to give all your users a day of training, at your site, is minimal. These costs cover everything, including travel and workbooks.

  • I trained a small fire and rescue organization in Wyoming for $3,000 total, including two 250-page workbooks for each user. They saved at least $25,000 switching to OpenOffice.org.
  • I trained the 300 users in a nearby Colorado city government for about $13,000. They saved about $250,000 switching to OpenOffice.org and Linux. (They're just around the corner from me, so there were no travel expenses.)
  • I trained 200 users over three weeks, half getting two days of training each, for about $15,000. Each user got at least one 250-page workbook; some got two. It's a private company that contracts to NASA so they didn't tell me how much they saved ;>  but I imagine it was a pretty good chunk.

See more about my training rates here and what they cover.

An aside: Most people haven't had training on Microsoft Office, either. It's interesting how many people don't know many standard Microsoft Office features, or that Ctrl C is copy.  Imagine how productive your users could be given the time to get training on all their current software, whatever it is.

Site Licenses and Educational Discounts

Yes, you say, but there are 30,000 potential users in my school district. That gets into money. I can't possibly afford trainng.

Well, that depends. You're definitely a candidate for a site license, so that you have the right to print all the copies you want of all my workbooks, onsite. I discount site licenses heavily, and particularly heavily for educational institutions. If you're thinking of switching to OpenOffice.org for your school district, don't assume you can't afford materials for everyone. I also charge less for training groups with site licenses.

Yes, OpenOffice.org is free. That doesn't mean the transition is free—users need a little help getting going, and they need to know their effort is appreciated. Change, period, whether to a new location, new software, or new processes, takes effort. But the cost of getting users  going on OpenOffice.org or StarOffice, and happy about it, isn't that high.

So think about it. Shoot me an email at training@getopenoffice.org, just to get some more info or ask about the site license. I'm happy to answer any questions about how to help your organization become a lean, mean (but happy), OpenOffice.org-using machine.

 

Here are some references:

 

 


Tags

I Want To Know What You Think I Should Put In My OpenOffice 2.0 Book

Teamopenofficewithbooks

Will you be on my OpenOffice.org 2.0 Book Team?

Some of you have seen this page on Amazon for the past, oh, decade. ;> 

Due to weirdness with Amazon, I have not been able to get it off their site.

MewritingBut! Now I am actually writing it! I've got content, it's goin' fast, it's going to be out by spring.

It's not going to be another 4-pound behemoth—I do like covering everything but there's also an important place for an 80/20, just-the-most-used-features, approach. The OpenOffice.org 2.0 book on Amazon will be around 500 pages and will not include things like master documents, macros, or basically the advanced features that are cool but less frequently used.

I might do an advanced “Part 2” kind of book, like the Core Java folks did with their books. But right now, we're looking at a good solid for-everyone sort of book with emphasis on the basics.

Not to say that it will be nothing but “To make text bold, click the B icon. See illustration at right.” This book will tell you how to do cool stuff, powerful stuff, stuff that will make your job easier and make you, with luck, pump your first in the air and say “I rule!!!”

That's where you come in.
I've got the main content, all the procedures and lessons that need to be in the book. But I've got a section for each chapter or chunk of chapters tentatively titled OpenOffice.org Power Tools.  So for each main topic area I'll include cool powerful, not-overwhelmingly-complicated, widely applicable, power tips.

Things like:

  • PDF, of course, including File > Send > Document as PDFAttachment
  • Making a template and assigning it to be the one you get when you choose File > New

I want to know what you think would be good additions to those sections. I want the book to really be something people will find valuable and a great resource for all those specific but really essential things that can muck up your day if you can't do them or they're a pain.

So tell me. What has saved your butt with OpenOffice.org? What did you think it couldn't do, that you really needed, and found out it could? (Or maybe you don't know how to do it, but really wish it could?)

Please leave a comment with suggestions. (The comments won't appear immediately; I monitor comments and trackbacks, due to a recent spell of interesting links from the folks peddling films of women with their ponies.) I'll repost this blog periodically to keep getting suggestions.

I'll of course credit anyone with a suggestion I use in the book. (By submitting a comment, you're saying that's OK. blah blah legal blah blah.)

I'll be posting parts of the book, as well, to get feedback. I want it to be clear, readable, fun if at all possible, and of course, really, really helpful.

Thanks!


Tags

Migrating Users to OpenOffice.org or StarOffice: Updated

I've updated my steps for migrating a group to OpenOffice.org, with emphasis on the human factors. There are some fun new ideas as well as expanding on some of the old ones. If this is something you're considering, take a look.

The Microsoft Office 2007 Upgrade Is Going to Have a Big Learning Curve--and a Big Price. Now's the Time to Consider OpenOffice.org Instead.


Logo_openofficebetter2

 

Office 2007 Is Just Another Upgrade...Right?
In a word. No.

This is going to be huge. Painful. Expensive. And that's before you get to the enormous retraining costs.

Here's why.

Microsoft Office 2007 Is a Radical Redesign of the User Interface, and Will Require Plenty of Retraining

Here's the current Microsoft Word toolbar.

Toolbar1_1
 
Courtesy of LInux Watch  and linked articles, here's a screen shot of MS Word 2003. Click to see a larger version.

Office2003

MS Office 12 looks entirely different, and changes constantly as you move in the document. Click this image to see a larger version.

Office12_toolbar_1

And again courtesy of Linux Watch, here's a screen shot of MS Office 2007. Click to see a larger version.
Office12word

You can't just install this on all 500 computers at your organization and tell people there's a new version.

The Buzz on Microsoft Office 2007 Is the Retraining

Experts around the planet are leary of the radically changed new interface.

Here's an excerpt from an article on eWeek.

Heading the list of challenges facing Microsoft is the fact that Office 2007 has a new user interface, which could require extensive staff retraining at a significant cost, as well as a new file format, which has the potential to create compatibility issues, analysts such as Joe Wilcox of Jupiter Research, told eWEEK.

"When you introduce something new, it disrupts, and this increases things like help desk costs and employee downtime," Wilcox said. "So, to get to the benefits that come with this, they have to get past whatever retraining will be needed around the new user interface and any hardships around the new file format, which are always disruptive. These are two big hurdles Microsoft has to get around."

Enterprise customers such as Robert Rosen, CIO for the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and an eWEEK Corporate Partner, agree. The new user interface and file formats pose "major concerns and will slow up adoption significantly," Rosen said. "Since we don't know enough about the benefits of Office 2007, we have not yet developed any plans to move forward."

And another quote:

Jupiter Research's Wilcox told eWEEK that if there were ever an opportunity for StarOffice and OpenOffice.org, "this might be it, going head-to-head against Office 2007, because we have a new file format and a new user interface, which means a lot of extra cost," and which could torpedo many enterprises from upgrading.

In addition, a lot of Software Assurance contracts are expiring between now and the end of July, and Microsoft will be aggressively beating the sales drum. Those businesses might well be looking at their alternatives and options before signing a new contract, he said.


Here's Paul Thurott:

For the first time ever, Microsoft has dramatically changed the Office interface, replacing the standard menu-and-toolbar interface we've known since the earliest Windows applications with a new UI paradigm based on context-sensitive ribbons and tabs."

Here are quotes from Paul's article on the new office software, from Jacobe Jaffe, Group Product Manager on the Office team.

As a personal anecdote, I have a variety of PCs, and on one of those machines for a variety of reasons, I still have Office 2003 installed. I use Office 12 essentially full time, and for me to go back into 2003 is not so good. It's pretty painful, actually."

And Paul's follow-up comment--keeping in mind that he's an expert user.

 But because this requires a different skill set to accomplish, I had to relearn how to do this. Long story short, most things are easier, but some power user features will require some more work....I'm nitpicking here, of course. The truth is, the Office 12 interface is so much dramatically better than previous versions, it's hard to find fault with it. On the other hand, I am a power user who uses Office all day long, and I slightly resent having to relearn certain skills. I'll get over it.

Mark Shuttleworth (founder of the Ubuntu project, second space tourist and freedom toaster guy), makes this point, posted by Justin here.

This might not be a direct quote but it's Justin's restatement of Mark's point.

"Office 12 has had substantial UI changes, since Microsoft is trying to distance themselves from the Open Office project. End result, users will require re-training. So which is easier? Re-train users in new Office 12? Or simply, start using Open Office which quite frankly looks just like MS Office today."

Here's another blog along the same lines, Ted's Radio Blog, with a similar conclusion at the end.

"Seven different versions. Dozens of applications, with various features disabled. Nightmarish new licenses. New servers. What a mess! All this to print documents, calculate spreadsheets and do other routine office work? I think Microsoft is overreaching here. They may sell to their captive audience, but new computer users whose machines come with Corel Office or OpenOffice are going to be hard-pressed to find a reason to switch. If you haven't tried OpenOffice.org, there's no better time than the present!"

Think about all those users out there.  Switching, if they all do, is not going to be easy. Take a look at just one part of it. Think about how the people who call you, the IT support folks, are going to react. Think about Laura in accounting or Bob down in contracts.

Heck, IBM Isn't Going to Upgrade to Windows Vista at All
IBM will be using RedHat for the operating system and their own riff on OpenOffice.org for their office suite.

Here's an article on it, and related sites on the Windows Vista Weblog and Groklaw.

It All Comes Back to Economics 101

You're happy now with Microsoft Office.

But things change, and the cost can grow to outweigh the benefit.

What if this:
Fulcrumlogo

changed to this?

Fulcrumlogo2

Think About the Cost and Benefit of the Upgrade to Microsoft 2007. Really Think About It.
 If you feel that the new UI in this version could change your world and your users' worlds,  there might be a wonderful promised land of fabulous easy of use waiting on the other side of the River of Retraining. There might be. But ya gotta cross the River of Retraining first, and some of your users are going to rock the boat.

I'm not saying you shouldn't use Microsoft Office just because they're changing the interface. I'm saying, you're going to have to retrain people. As long as you have to retrain people, why not consider all your options?

Switching from your current Microsoft software to Office 2007 will require:

  • A lot of money for the software
  • Training and documentation
  • Time and effort to install and convert documents

Switching from your current Microsoft software to OpenOffice.org will require:

  • A lot of money for the software
  • Training and documentation
  • Time and effort to install and convert documents

$ + retraining + effort > retraining + effort


The Microsoft Office 2007 Upgrade is more expensive in money, time, and effort than switching to OpenOffice.org.


This Too: OpenOffice.org and Microsoft Office Currently Look More Similar Than Office 2003 and Office 2007
Training your users to go from Office 2003, or before, to OpenOffice.org, might be easier than teaching them the whole new Office 2007 system.

Here's the current Microsoft Word toolbar, and the toolbar for OpenOffice.org Writer. Right now, they're really similar.  Click each to see a bigger image. See how long it takes to tell which is which.

Toolbar1_1

Toolbar2_1

And here's an OpenOffice.org screen shot. Not that different.

Openoffice2

Retraining Aside: Do You Need the 2007 Features?

As a commenter on this blog, George Wenger, states, "The vast majority of users in a so-called "average" business setting already have no use for 90% of the existing features of Word, let alone a whole set of new features."

Your job is to make everyone else's job easier. When you walk by the software users in the hall, you want them to say, "Hey, Jim! I can do that mail merge now!" and maybe offer a high five. 

Does Marsha in Accounting or Bob in Contracts need ribbon toolbars and a new UI paradigm?

How many of the new features does your organization actually need? Have the support staff been begging you for this one?

"We're also enabling a new mobile scenario with OneNote Mobile," Jaffe told me. "So literally you'll be able to have a OneNote notebook available to you on a mobile device, like a Windows Powered Smartphone. You can take notes on your Smartphone, or read your [PC-based notes on the Smartphone. The pages in that Smartphone notebook align to the information you have in your PC version of OneNote. They sync up through ActiveSync."

And think about these questions:
- How many complaints will you get about how everything's different?
- What will the overall attitude be like when users come in Monday morning and their desktops are different?
- How much will you spend on training and documentation to get people up and running on Office 2007.

Switching to OpenOffice.org Means You Can Have Your IT Cake and Eat at Least Part of It, Too
With OpenOffice.org, you can be the kick-butt IT guy who gives your users software that might even be easier to learn than Office 2007, and saves the company money. The VP's assistant Chris loves you, and the VP loves you. Doesn't get much better than that.

If after careful evaluation of 2007, the alternatives (OpenOffice.org among others), and what is involved in upgrading, you still think MS Office 2007 is the best solution for your users' needs, go ahead and upgrade. (Keep in mind that users do not need to be "cool."  ;>  They do need health insurance.)

But it might not be, and it's important to think about your choices. If your job is to deliver the best product for the best value and have your users be able to do their jobs well, please think about the choices.

References for switching to OpenOffice.org: See this post on the process of migrating a group of users who might be resisting the process, and this post on top ten reasons to switch to OpenOffice.org (besides the one covered in this post).


Tags

Goobuntu--Is Google Doing Its Own Linux (Including OpenOffice.org)?

It's the hottest new open source news--today, anyway. ;>   Click here to read one of many posts.

, , , , ,

Spending Your Money on Something Important

Logo_education

Office suite software isn't really all that important.

What's important is pretty much anything else. What your organization is doing: research, services, saving lives, preserving order, education. Preserving the rain forest. Rebuilding New Orleans. Job retraining. Heck, you could argue that a good pumpkin pie is essentially more important than software.

OK, the office suite software helps you do all those things I listed and a million more. But I want to point out that our goal in our eight hours a day is not to use software. It's everything else.

All right. So now think about this.

OpenOffice.org is free.

Other office suites are not.

You switch to OpenOffice.org, and you or your organization is suddenly not spending $500, or $50,000, or $5 million on your office suite licenses.

Add up all the other people or organizations who are no longer spending that money on an office suite, and suddenly we're into some serious cash.

Think about how much your city police force spends on office suite software, and about how that money could probably do some good if it were spent on, say, salaries for additional police.

Think about what that research facility down the road spends on software. Compared to the money they spend for their equipment, maybe not much, but it's money probably better spent on upping the salaries for a few poor post-docs than on office suite software.

Think about how much money the federal government spends on office suite software. Now fantasize about how you would redirect that money if you were in charge.

(Almost makes $4,000 toilet seats pale in comparison, doesn't it? OK, toilet seats are already white, but you know what I mean.)

Amazon saved $17 million when they switched to Linux. Same principle--pay less for something that's not part of your core business.

Think about how much your state spends on office suite software for schools, and how many more teachers and books that money could buy.

A lot.

Education is one of the most important places to think about OpenOffice.org. Education is, to put it mildly, important. Plus, third graders aren't likely to complain that they're used to how Word does styles and they don't want to switch. They're open to anything new. And education isn't exactly overfunded. I live in Colorado which is either 49th or 47th in the nation in funding for education.

For educators, here's an interesting article on trends this year, including OpenOffice.org. 

So this year, think about how much money you're spending on your office suite, and what you could do with that money that would be more important. Especially in education.

Note: Added January 31, 2006. See this post on the top ten techie things to think about for libraries.


Tags

OpenOffice Training

I worked at Sun Educational Services for a few years, and one ongoing debate was what the training books should be like. Should they offer extensive information, or a set of exercises and a skeleton for the instructor to work with? And furthermore, what type of business were we in? Education (say it to yourself with a pompous tenured sort of voice) or Training (use kind of a sarcastic tinny voice).

There was endless debate about what the difference was and which was more effective for learning software until someone, I forget who, made it all very clear. Probably a project manager who had spent a few painful years unemployed after obtaining a very lovely liberal arts education.

He or she said "Think about your sex education class."

Everyone did. It had been a long meeting and we were happy for any distraction.

We discussed what it had been like. Confusing, obscure diagrams, no one really getting to the point, and wandering out of the classroom with very little idea of what sex was, per se, much less how to do it with any degree of success.

"All right," said the savvy project manager. "Now think about this phrase. Sex training."

And everybody did. And started laughing. Because that made everything a lot different. Training is typically very very distinctly different than Education. At least in many people's experiences and in the word associations we have with it.

That might be an unusual way to start talking about OpenOffice.org training, but I love that story and I think it makes it clear how important it is to have hands-on time in a lab with an expert. Training. If it's important that people do something right, then training is important. You can throw books on desks, and that does work for some people, and of course it's a handy reference. But I believe that memories of doing things are a whole lot stronger than memories of reading things. (How many of you tell long, amusing, detailed stories about when you read something?)

It's partly about attention, the difference between education/information and training. Send out a memo about how to do a better mail merge and it gets lost in the inbox. Nobody forgets entirely about a day or a week spent doing a better mail merge.

Another aspect of training, specifically for open source products like open office, is that it shows commitment. Open office training is important for giving new users not only the skills they need but to instill confidence that the organization is committed to the switch, and that the software will work. You know it'll work, but the people being transferred, who were comfortable with their old tools, don't. Open Office training makes the transition go better.

One aspect of training versus reading a book is that training has to be limited in time. Generally, people spend a day learning an office suite, maybe a couple more days learning advanced features. So the classes have to focus on the most important features, the 80/20. The 20% of features that people spend 80% of their time using. So training, at least good training, is going to be more focused.

Here's another  thing. Most people never had much education or training on the office suite they use now. Much knowledge is handed down from one user to another, from Becky to Dolores to Sam, and can get changed a lot in the process. And if Becky never had an opportunity to sit down and learn the software, hands on, she might not have been able to pass on effective, productive information.

Another thing. The difference between struggling to do something the hard way, and doing something quickly and easily the smart, quick way, is big. The difference in productivity for one task might be a minute or a week. Multiply that over years and over all the people using the software, and you're looking at serious time, effort, and resources. Lots of money.

And another. People feel good when they do a good job. When they can take a tool and use it to do what they need to. Frustration makes people feel bad. As the counselor on South Park might say, “Frustration is baaaad.” Give users the gift of expertise. One of the things I love about doing training is seeing the light go on. The previously discouraged student in the third row starts saying things like "Oh my god--I could use this for our monthly Qentori documents and just do it all automatically!" I have even had students (Canadian students!) say "I'm so excited my head's going to blow off!" Just the other day, a student in my Writer class actually did a chair dance, with lots of arm-waving, when she got the send-document-as-PDF-attachment feature to work and realized how much time and effort it was going to save her. Sitting and working in class, asking questions, going through the exercises and seeing how to do things quickly and efficiently, means your users are going to be able to get that power, and the confidence that comes with it.

When users understand and control their tools, and feel like they are powerful, knowledgeable users, they like their jobs better. They do their jobs better. I might even go so far as to assert that people are more likely to make another pot of coffee when they take the last cup, they're so happy. Feeling like you're in control of your tools, and not the other way around, is a Good Thing.

So that's my plug for training. Give your software users the gift of being able to stand up at their desks in the middle of the day, throw a fist in the air, and shout “I RULE!”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Postscript: My friend Kathy Sierra (also at Sun during the anecdote related at the top of this post) writes a blog on passionate users. Her learning theory post is a great guide to how to create learning, not just talking about facts in the same room as students. I can't  always do all of the things she lists in training classes, but here's what I make a point of doing.

- Showing, not just blathering on about how to do something
- Engaging students emotionally as much as possible; I inject a bit of humor into the learning materials, and I have a whole song and dance about the Evil Plain Indent Icon and the Wonderful Indent Icons on the Bullets and Numbering toolbar
- Demonstrating potential mistakes when I show how the software works, as well as how to avoid or recover from mistakes
- Using stories; the training materials are based on the premise that that student is an intern at a fictional bookstore, and the motivation for the exercises is based on the demands of a crazy marketing person; an unreasonable boss; a new advertising campaign; etc.
- Fun ; for reviews, I sometimes have a Jeopardy-like game and divide the students into two teams, with chocolate for everyone at the end. Or I bring a nerf ball and have the students throw the ball around. When you catch the ball, you have to say something you learned that day, and how to do it.
- Helping students feel confident; when parts of the software are weird, badly implemented, or just complicated, I make sure they know that it is. It's a lot easier, and people feel much better learning, a complicated procedure when they know it's tough and that any progress is good.  I also try to show students how much they already know by showing the toolbar for Word and for Writer side by side, for instance. Students immediately see the similarities and I reinforce that they already know much of what they do in Word since the tools on the toolbar are so similar.

Since writing this post, I've checked on whether Sun offers Staroffice training and from what I can tell, they don't. They have little free things they'll give out but you can't go to Sun (at least according to their web site) for StarOffice training. I find this odd, but I find many things about Sun odd. At any rate, any training you find on OpenOffice.org training will work fine for StarOffice training, and vice versa.

See also part 1 and part 2 of an article about creating databases in the new database tool in OpenOffice.org 2.0, and the article on  views in OpenOffice.org 2.0.



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Transitioning a Team of People to OpenOffice.org: Updated 2006

Changingchafinglogo_2   

Note: See also this article and this article on the legal aspects of open source licenses. See also this article by Bruce Byfield, but for group migration, please ignore the item on not expecting to need training. ;>

One person learning a new program is a simple process. Decide, learn, do. But switching over ten, a thousand, or ten thousand users can be a little more involved. You get a few more things involved:

  • One person decides to switch. With 100 users, it's certain that at least one of them didn't want to switch.
  • One person can affect the attitude of many others, positively or negatively. If Chris starts working on the new program, learns to use it, and others see that, then they believe they can use it, too. If Chris doesn't try, doesn't learn, and others see her failing, they think they'll fail too.
  • And this is before anyone even starts complaining about, or praising, the product. How users talk about the product, especially the dominant people in your organization, really affects it. How the head of marketing talks about it, how the manager of the desktop publishers for your internal publications group talks about it, how Marge in accounting who's been there 20 years talks about it--all that matters enormously.
  • Anytime you do something involving a lot of people, whether it's new software or soap or sandwiches, unexpected problems arise. You really can't over-plan a project involving a lot of people.

 

To make the switch as calm, cool, and collected as possible, you need to plan. Plan not just the physical implementation, the installation, but plan the social and mental implementation with the people who will use it. To make a somewhat odd analogy, the issue with the space shuttle problems was not really the foam or the O rings. It was the communication between the engineers and the people who made the decision, and it was the culture that made it OK not to report problems. The physical issues with switching to the software can be handled. The most important thing you can do is make sure the human part of the transition is done well.

Here are a few thoughts based on my experience with the product, and what I’ve gathered doing training for other companies over the last four years.

1. Talk to Other People Who've Done It. Take an OpenOffice.org-Using IT Director to Lunch.
Find others who are or have been in your position, and just find out what their experiences were like. You can learn so much from just talking to other people who’ve adopted the program. Get on the users@openoffice.org mailing list (www.openoffice.org) and find other people in your position who are using OpenOffice.org. Google around the Web; maybe you actually know someone at Ernie Ball Music, for instance (http://news.com.com/2008-1082-5065859.html) and can just go over there at lunch and find out how their transition went. Start or join a Yahoo discussion group just for people who are considering or in transition.

Get as much technical and cultural information from them as possible. Others' experience is really valuable.

2. Make Sure It's Got the Features Your Users Absolutely Need, and See What Additional Features It Provides.
Research how OpenOffice.org works and what it can do. This task can be done by you, by your motivated IT person, or anyone else you assign to or hire for the task. But the thing is, you’ve got some core features that your users absolutely must have, some tasks they complete that they must do but might not have to do the way they’re doing.

The drawing program might allow you to ditch your licenses for Visio or Corel or Canvas or Illustrator. The data source connection features are extremely powerful. Keep an eye out not just on what you already use that you have to have, but on what you can’t do now that you could do with OpenOffice.org.

A note on Excel macros--some people use them to do things that can be done perfectly well with Calc functions. So if you hear that the macros won't convert, ask what the macros are actually accomplishing.

If you don't find a feature at first, check around. Perhaps more than other programs, OpenOffice.org has a high ratio of “stuff it can do” to “stuff you can see that it can do.” For some features, it’s easy when you know how—you just have to know how. So get googling, get a book, get a free doc download from www.openoffice.org, get a little training, go to a seminar, ask the users@openoffice.org mailing list, etc.

Don't be afraid to mix and match. If you Sam and Francine must have some Excel macros for certain spreadsheets, then keep a few licenses. You're looking for the best solution, not necessarily purely all open source all the time.

Find the people at your organization who just love to fiddle with software all day. and ask them (with their managers' permission) to spend some time just dinkin' around. They'll find stuff that everyone else misses, and they'll help start culture that it's cool new software.

There will be at least one very specific thing that users do that you won't expect, that can't obviously be done with OpenOffice.org. (Of course, you can't convert to PDF in Microsoft Office; it's true of any software.) Really pay attention to what the tasks is actually trying to accomplish, rather than focusing on the task itself. There might be a workaround, another feature that does a similar thing, or simply an organizational, non-software solution.

For instance, if Jim really needs to have the flotsam feature, it might be because Dave always asked for documents to be delivered in flotsam format. Dave doesn't actually need it, it's just that that's what he's used to; plus Dave is leaving the organization in a month. Jetsam format might do just as well.

Consider interoperability.  Take a few documents back and forth between OOo and Word, or your office suite. See how it works. Consider, and research, how many documents users receive from Microsoft Office users and need to edit, and how many users need to send to Microsoft Office users, and whether those documents need to be edited. If most or all the documents you need to send out can be sent in PDF rather than Word, you're golden. Or if the documents go between formats nicely, you're also a nice warm yellow.

3. Find Other Sources for the Cute Stuff Word and Publisher Provide
One of the things many users really like doesn't have anything to do with the actual software. They like the goodies. Word’s vast collection of clipart is nice but isn't really all that necessary. You can get similar goodies elsewhere.  The Big Box of Art has a million images and is $60 or so, and then there's the open source clip art library.

For cool templates, remind users that all their current templates can be opened successfully in OpenOffice.org. So all the pretty stuff still works. There are also many OpenOffice.org templates out there. Just google away--here are some on the OpenOffice.org site.

Publisher does not provide any decent export so all the Publisher files will be left behind. But Writer and Draw are decent alternatives, with use of the aforementioned clip art.

4. Time to Get Your Hands Dirty and Convert Some Test Documents
Experiment with the program. Now it’s time to take OpenOffice.org out for a real spin and see what she does on your organization’s documents. Some transitions, especially now with the enhanced compatibility and filters in OpenOffice.org 2.0, go really well. Some have some interesting tweaks to make that, once made, work fine. It all depends on what your docs are like.

Here are some tips on converting documents.
- Hang out in Tools > Options. There are a lot of windows here that can help. Default tab settings are a big factor. Open a text document and choose Tools > Options > Writer > General lets you fiddle with those.  Tools > Options > Writer  > Compatibility is another great window; fiddle with these. Try marking the Printer Metrics option first.   Click the image to see if larger if you like.

Toolsoptions_2

Then open a Calc spreadsheet, choose Tools > Options > Calc >  General, and try those settings. Click the image to see if larger if you like.
Toolsoptionsclac

- Use the Conversion Wizard. You can convert mass numbers of Word files to OpenOffice.org. Choose File > Wizards > Document Converter.

Converter

Consider contracting out some of the conversion. If your users don't have to convert it all themselves, they'll be a lot happier.

Don't expect perfect conversion. Even conversion between versions of Word isn't perfect.

<>

Consider which documents you actually need to convert.  If you have a document you provide that doesn't actually need to be changed, just make a PDF of it and leave it as is. (You might need to use another product to make the PDF if it doesn't open nicely in OpenOffice.org.) Or print it or scan it, and leave it as is. 



5. Get the Influential People On Your Side

This is what I was talking about earlier. Once you've got the program kind of figured out, invite the managers and a smattering of "regular users," including the people who other users listen to, to a lunch and learn.

Tell them the advantages, show them the software, show the cool features, let them fiddle with it, and show off the new features that you don't have with your current software. PDF comes to mind, the drawing program (File > New > Draw) comes to mind. Make some labels and mark the Synchronize checkbox on the last tab of the labels window, then show how you can make a change to one labell and click Synchronize to apply that change to all the others.

Ask for their input. Ask about how they will do their jobs day to day with the new software. Make sure you have a good ratio of people who like it, to people who might complain. Tell all the people who are invited that they're an important part of the adoption process (they are), and that you need their input to ensure that OpenOffice.org can help them do their jobs.

Before the lunch and learn, make sure you have buy-in from whoever's at the top of your organization. Make sure that he or she communicates to his reports that they need to show support for the product, or they'll have departments full of dissatisfied users who don't feel like they can do their jobs with the new software. (Nobody wants that in their department.) Have those managers  then show up at the lunch and learn. Not to say "you're using it, get over it," but to show enthusiasm. Have them get a little giggly over the drawing tool (you can do cool 3D stuff) or be overly impressed by the mail merge tool. Not to put on an over-acting show; just to make sure that they demonstrate, as well as state, support and enthusiasm.

Depending on how these go, you might want to have a few.

Another idea to get influential people on board is to give them some say in how the money saved will be spent. If anti-change Sam from Accounting can tell people that he's the one responsible for switching money from the software budget to the health care plan, he might be more enthusiastic.

When you send out reports on the lunch and learn, be sure to mention that Sam, Brenda, and Lucy all had excellent suggestions, and worked hard to provide much-needed input to the IT team.

Consider schwag.  Everyone on the OpenOffice.org Transition Advisory Team (your lunch and learns) gets a mug, a tshirt, something. Make'em on Cafepress.com. Order 15 to get a bulk discount. The schwag could be plain, just the OpenOffice.org logo, or be self-mocking, "I Gave the IT Team a Piece of My Mind" or a pun, "Open to Discussion: OpenOffice.org 2006 Transition Advisory Team."

6. Execute a Transition Plan.
As many people say, just do it. Introduce the adoption schedule and let people know that while you’ll be giving them time, training and manuals and rewards. You absolutely must make sure everyone knows they're not going to be thrown into the new software without help. Make sure they know that there will be help, there will be time, there will be training and documentation.

This is also the time to start transitioning your legacy documents to OpenOffice.org, or planning how it will occur.

The other part of this step is the tough love--make sure that people know it *is* going to happen and no amount of objections will stop it. (You've already done a lot of research and gotten a lot of feedback, so you know at this stage that switching is the right decision.) Make sure people know that Microsoft Office or their other office suite will fall off the face of the earth in three months. (Or whatever your transition timeline is.) The exception to this is if you're keeping the old software around to edit legacy documents. In this case, though, you might want to have that software on selected computers, or do something else to make sure that as of the launch date, everyone is using OpenOffice.org on new documents.

7. Offset Fear and Confusion With Information and Support.

Demonstrate how it works to the people who will be using it. People are usually going to be apprehensive about the idea of change, but you can reduce that considerably just by doing a few seminars, demos, lunch and learns, and other short and reassuring demonstrations of what it’s going to be like. Make sure everyone in the organization comes to at least one session. Show the object bars at the top of each application, for instance. The Word and Writer, and Excel and Calc object bars, look very similar. Then slowly show how a few of the core procedures will be performed. Simply knowing what the change is going to be like, ahead of time, alleviates some fear and change resistance. I’ve seen this repeatedly when I do training.

Give short quick-reference handouts at the end of each presentation, so that everyone has at least a little documentation, before they even touch the software.

Again, consider schwag. Give a magnet, button, sticker, etc. to everyone who asks a question during the presentation. Cafepress.com is a goodplace to do this. The person who asks the most questions (constructive ones) might get a USB drive or a small MP3 player or another prize.

8. Show Appreciation.

People will be happier doing just about anything if you recognize the effort they're putting into it publicly.  In all communications, in training, in demos, etc., be sure to recognize that they will be the ones learning the new product, that this is a significant task, and that you appreciate it.

Another thing you can do is just plain provide rewards. Suggestions include prizes for:

  • The department that completely switches to OpenOffice.org first
  • The person who logs the most “Cool OpenOffice.org Tips” on the company intranet
  • The person who does the most document conversion.

Motivational rewards can be anything--a department pizza party or trip to the waterslides, an extra day off on a three-day weekend, a weekend trip for two to the nearby national park. Whatever works, based on your people and the money you’re saving.

9. Teach Users How to Use the Product.

It's important to have OpenOffice training. The training can take many forms. It can be one book and your in-house open source enthusiast (who will be patient with users who have less experience than he or she does). You can send everyone in the organization to OpenOffice.org training or have someone come onsite to train. You can hire someone to teach your internal trainers. You can obtain OpenOffice.org books, training materials, or both. Make sure that everyone at least has a reference book for the department to use.

Make sure everyone has used the product before they have to start using it. You wouldn't give someone a car who didn't know how to drive. Give'em a chance to learn before they have to do their job.

Make sure that everyone has a CD to use it at home. When I do training, at least half the people in each class want a CD to use at home.

10. Consider an Ongoing Joke or a Big Payoff.
When I was at Great Plains Software, our main architect Dave Gaboury wore a Great Plains Dynamics tshirt every day for a year and a half until our Dynamics product shipped. (He had seven.) Maybe for your Openoffice.org project, the IT head wears the same OpenOffice.org project tshirt until everyone is up and running on the software, or maybe he or she dies their hair green, or tries out for American Idol, if all the departments are up and running successfully by the official transition date.

11. Make the Official Switch.
As promised, make it happen. Take the other office suite off all desktops (unless you still need it some places as noted above). People will use what's familiar, if they can. It's like when I went to France in college--I hung out with my friend Stephanie who spoke French much better than I did. When she left Rennes for Paris for her internship--well, gosh, my French got a lot better when I had to speak it and understand it. Go figure. ;>


Tags

Top Ten Reasons to Start a Healthy New Relationship With OpenOffice.org

Logosavemoney_3

I'm not a raving crazy open source OpenOffice.org fanatic. Not quite, anyway.

I do like it quite a bit, though.  I've used it for six years, about the same amount of time I've used Word and Framemaker. I've trained people on it for the last three years and have written about it for five years.

So I know about the limitations, the cool stuff, the weird stuff, and the normal stuff.

And I think it's a far better choice then Microsoft Word.

(It's not always a better choice than Framemaker, but it was never meant to be. It's far more similar to Word. See my blog on whether OpenOffice.org is a good tool for techwriters and other book publishing professionals.)

I want anyone who's frustrated with Microsoft Office, who doesn't have the money for Microsoft Office, or who just wants the features of OpenOffice.org, to understand everything the program has to offer. With Sun in charge of marketing the program, the great aspects of the program are far less well known than they should be, and so many people are out there cursing the random bulleting in Word when they could be writing documents with a program that does exactly what they ask it to. (Always refreshing.)

So here are ten reasons for anyone out there to use OpenOffice.org. They're not presented in any particular order.

Price, Price, Price

You can read all the reports from Microsoft that you want but that doesn't change the fact that OpenOffice.org is absolutely free. All updates are free. Always will be. If you personally on your own computer decide to download OpenOffice.org for free instead of buying each new version of Microsoft Office, you're spending absolutely no money. If your department switches to OpenOffice.org at work, you're spending absolutely no money.

Add Linux to the mix and you're spending maybe $100, depending on your distro.

Microsoft Office costs more. Windows costs more.

If you purchase books and training, you're spending a flat one-time amount, and it's not going to be $500 a person unless you're buying some serious one-on-one tutoring. I trained 300 people for a client in Houston over three weeks, with each person attending two day-long classes, for a total cost to my client of $15,000. That's $50 a person. That's a good price.

Document conversion can take time and money too, but that's a one-time fee, too. And with the enhancements in OpenOffice.org to the compatibility with Microsoft Office ( http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/2.0/index.html), converting your Microsoft Office documents to OpenOffice.org is even easier.

And frankly, there's a bunch of learning that users need to do with each new version of Microsoft Office. That takes training money, or else users never get the training and might not learn the new version very well.

There Are More Important Things to Spend Money on the Office Suite Software

Think about the most important things in life.

Health. Love. Family. A roof over your head. Education. World peace.

The right or privileg of using office suite software you're familiar with, or even just having everyone using the same software, is not on the list. I challenge anyone out there to rank using Microsoft Office as one of the most important things in life.

Which leads one naturally to think about schools. Police stations. Libraries. City government. State government. Federal government. What do they spend money on? Some fairly important stuff. Much of the stuff from our earlier list. They pay teachers' salaries, police salaries, allocate money for healthcare, and a zillion other things. And of course, most of them use Microsoft Office. Not for free. Take all the money they spend on Microsoft Office, replace it with OpenOffice.org, and that frees up a lot of money for important things. I'm not sure how much but I don't think I'm out of line in saying hundreds of millions of dollars a year.

Runs on Windows, Linux, Solaris, Mac, OS/2 and Other Operating Systems

You're not stuck with Windows when you use OpenOffice.org. If you're happy with Windows, then you can stay with Windows. If you're all about Linux, or Mac, or OS/2, or Solaris, then OpenOffice.org works the same way on those operating systems, too. Which makes sense, since your operating system shouldn't have so much control over what software you use.

Learning a New Program Isn't as Difficult as You Might Think

Think about writing a text document.

What do you do?

You type. You make things bold. You print.

There are only so many things you can do in a text document, and there aren't that many different ways to do them. The same applies to numbers in spreadsheets. You add, you subtract, you calculate the internal rate of return.

The point is, the differences between office suites aren't all that huge. Take a look at the main text toolbar for Microsoft Word and OpenOffice.org.

Bothtoolbars

Something else I've observed in training is that a lot of people never received training on Microsoft Office in the first place. They aren't working as efficiently or powerfully as they could with the office suite they currently use. So when you switch people to a new office suite like OpenOffice.org and give them a day or two of training, they're going to be working more efficiently with the new office suite than the old one.

OpenOffice.org Is Free, Runs on All Operating Systems, So Everyone Can Use It. No More Digital Divide

With many functions of jobhunting, schools, government, and other essential functions done using the computer, it's very important that everyone be able to complete these functions. When a government agency sends out information or requires submission of information using a Word document, that's unfair and an undue burden on someone who just needs a job or needs to pay taxes. Imagine that FEMA required that all applications for assistance had to be done in Word.

Anything that we are required to do or need to do must be doable without paying $500 for the tool. Especially when something as useful and powerful as OpenOffice.org is freely available now.

OpenOffice.org means equal opportunity. You can read Word, Excel, and Powerpoint files, and create them, as well.

Small File Sizes

This seems kind of trivial, after talking about universal access to required functions. But it's something to think about. OpenOffice.org file sizes are roughly 1/10th the size of their Microsoft Office counterparts. This isn't so much an issue for your own personal computer, but think about network servers, and about email files around. Having smaller file sizes is a tremendous advantage.

Great Drawing Tools

Drawing3dblue Anyone using Illustrator, or perhaps Photoshop should take a look at OpenOffice.org Draw (File > New > Draw), especially the new 2.0 version. The prefab shapes are amazing, there are precise controls for curve points, you can export to EPS, JPG and more, you can convert any item to a curve, polygon, bitmap, or 3D, there's curved text formatting like in Photoshop...the list goes on and on. I can spend an entire weekend just fiddling happily with Draw.

Take a look at this OpenOffice.org 1.x file; it's all done from scratch within the program. Here's a thumbnail of what's in it.(And by the way, speaking of small file sizes in the previous item, the file size is 14k.)

Bowloffruit

Download bowloffruit.sxd

Solid Styles for Formatting Text and Page Layout

Styles are how you make your document do what you want it to. Styles are things like the paragraph style Heading1 which is 18 points big, Helvetica, with 12 points of space below it. Or the bulleted list style DiamondBullet that has a black diamond for the bullet character, and has three tenths of an inch from the bullet to the text. Or a page style with a footer centered at the bottom of the document half an inch from the edge, a header at the right side of the top of the document, and a left margin of an inch and a half.

Create or modify the styles you need, apply them to the text as you need, and life will be good.

Styles

OpenOffice.org doesn't randomly create new bullet or other styles and apply them to your text, it doesn't take every style you've ever created and infiltrate them into your other documents, and it doesn't get all twitchy with the formatting the way Microsoft Word does. Microsoft Word drives me up the wall. I think it's a sign of the apocalypse that something this uncontrollable is used so widely.

If you've always used Microsoft Word, take a look at OpenOffice.org. Use the styles. (Format > Styles and Formatting.) See how free of cursing and hair-pulling-out life can be.

In OpenOffice.org 2.0, a Nice Presentation Tool

The 1.x version, I must admit, was serviceable but not sexy. The 2.0 version looks a lot like Microsoft Powerpoint, has a zillion effects, and makes everything a lot easier. Check it out if you've used 1.x and been disappointed.

Impressnew_1

OpenOffice.org Doesn't Randomly Decide to Do Stuff to Your Document

You can see my blog on how to easily configure OpenOffice.org to do what you want it to do, not the default stuff by default.You control it through Tools > Autocorrect.

Wordcompletion_2


Welcome to the OpenOffice.org Blog: Why This 2,456,912,987th Blog Might Be Interesting to You

Logofortop 

I've got a fever, and the only prescription is to tell people about OpenOffice.org and StarOffice.

Here's the story.

In 1999, I was working at Sun when they bought StarOffice. A couple years later when I left, no one outside Sun had heard of StarOffice. I had finished a book on StarOffice but couldn't really recommend it as a great replacement for Microsoft Office for everyone.

A year later at BEA, a few people had heard of StarOffice, and OpenOffice.org was just beginning. And with OpenOffice.org and subsequent dot releases, the program got better. I got to the point of being able to recommend OpenOffice.org to most people.

And now I can recommend OpenOffice.org without qualification, 99% of the time, as an excellent replacement for Microsoft Office, WordPerfect or, god help you, Wordstar. I really wish I could also say that now everyone I talk to has heard about OpenOffice.org and StarOffice and at least knows to consider it as a replacement.

Not so much.

Ship_1 Here's this great product, absolutely free, that hardly anyone has heard of. This is frustrating to me, not just because professionally I need to work hard to just inform potential clients that there is a great product out there for them. It's frustrating because I've got a jones to get good free software out to everyone, to show people how powerful it is, and there's very little information flowing about it.

Sun is spectacularly bad at marketing so it's really no surprise, in the end. Disappointing, but not a surprise. The OpenOffice.org community is doing its best but as a group of volunteers, against the mighty PR machine of Microsoft Office, it's also not surprising that more people know Kato Kalin's middle name than about either StarOffice or OpenOffice.org.

But then a few things happened.

Along came Google. A somewhat successful company, shall we say. They announced a partnership with Sun to do various things with Java and OpenOffice.org. The details are still fuzzy on OpenOffice.org, but if Google has anything to do with getting OpenOffice.org out to the masses, I believe it's going to change everything about how we create documents.

My friend Kathy Sierra's blog has been going gangbusters, and she swore to me that blogs are the way to go to make a point and broadcast a message.

And my editor gave me a few extra months to get out the OpenOffice.org 2.0 book since things are up in the air a bit, with the release date and the arrangement with Google. (Thanks, Greg.)

So I'm feeling hopeful again and rip-roaring ready to show you how OpenOffice.org and StarOffice are really good. Not perfect, not substitutes for all DTP applications, but such a great alternative to Microsoft Office and other suites.

And free, of course.

Enough Already. What Is This Blog Going to Have in It?

I'm going to run the gamut—simple procedures for people new to the program, tips and tricks, advanced procedures from my workbooks, plus more process-oriented thoughts on document organization, design, best ways to use the features, converting documents. My main goal is my mantra—OpenOffice.org is cool, here's how to use it to make your life easier. Without too much hitting you over the head, and always being realistic.

So welcome to my blog. I hope you find it useful.


Tags